dc.contributor.advisor | Mg. Fanny Cruz Lopez | es_PE |
dc.contributor.author | Santiago Diaz, Anita | es_PE |
dc.contributor.author | Villanueva Escobedo, Karen Janely | es_PE |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-07-02T16:52:36Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-07-02T16:52:36Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023-12-26 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/47 | |
dc.description.abstract | This research began with the description and statement of the problem: How is
reading comprehension improved by using the Microsoft Whiteboard software in firstgrade high school students from the I.E. “Toribio Rodríguez de Mendoza” (State
Educational Institution “Toribio Rodríguez de Mendoza), in the province of Rodríguez
de Mendoza, 2023?
Therefore, analyzing whether the use of Microsoft Whiteboard software
improves reading comprehension was the main objective of this study. The research
population consisted of 90 students, of which 31 students from the first grade of room
“B” were used as the study sample. The screening process was based on a quantitative
approach of simple random sampling. In addition, the approach of the study was
applied research, since learning activities focused on the use of Microsoft Whiteboard
software were designed with the purpose of evaluating its impact on the improvement
of reading comprehension. In this sense, a pre-experimental research design known as
pre-test and post-test was carried out, in which the assignment of a single study group
was carried out in a conventional and deliberate manner.
To gather information and data, an evaluation rubric will be used to identify
and specify the level of reading comprehension before and after using the Microsoft
Whiteboard software. This was done to verify that the established main purpose was
achieved according to the stated objectives. Alternative categories were used to
analyze the information of each aspect of the dependent variable, which made it
possible to measure the perception of each of them. These data were then analyzed
using the Microsoft Whiteboard software application. In summary, it was concluded
that the application of Microsoft Whiteboard software had a significant impact on the
improvement of the reading comprehension of the students of the Educational
Institution “Toribio Rodríguez de Mendoza,” province of Rodríguez de Mendoza -
2023; 20% reached the distinguished level; and 60%, the achieved level, thus
demonstrating our proposed objective. | es_PE |
dc.description.tableofcontents | PÁGINA DEL JURADO...........................................................................................ii
RESUMEN iii
ABSTRACT iv
DEDICATORIA........................................................................................................ v
AGRADECIMIENTO .............................................................................................. vi
INTRODUCCIÓN..................................................................................................... 1
1. PROBLEMA DE INVESTIGACIÓN ................................................................ 3
1.1. Planteamiento del problema....................................................................... 3
1.2. Formulación del problema......................................................................... 5
1.2.1. Problema principal........................................................................ 5
1.2.2. Problemas específicos................................................................... 5
1.3. Objetivos de la investigación..................................................................... 6
1.3.1. Objetivo general ........................................................................... 6
1.3.2. Objetivos específicos.................................................................... 6
1.4. Formulación de la hipótesis....................................................................... 7
1.4.1. Hipótesis general .......................................................................... 7
1.4.2. Hipótesis específicas..................................................................... 7
1.5. Justificación de la investigación ................................................................ 8
1.5.1. Teórica, metodológica y práctica.................................................. 8
2. MARCO TEÒRICO ......................................................................................... 11
2.1. Antecedentes de la Investigación............................................................. 11
2.2. Bases teóricas........................................................................................... 14
2.3. Definición de términos básicos................................................................ 20
3. METODOLOGÍA Y ESTRATEGIAS DE INVESTIGACIÓN ...................... 49
3.1. Identificación de las variables de investigación ...................................... 49
3.1.1. Definición conceptual................................................................. 49
3.1.2. Definición operacional ............................................................... 50
3.2. Tipo, nivel y diseño de la investigación .................................................. 54
3.3. Técnicas e Instrumentos de recolección de datos.................................... 58
3.4. Procesos de prueba de hipótesis y análisis de datos ................................ 59
4. DESCRIPCIÓN DE LOS ANÁLISIS Y RESULTADOS ............................... 64
4.1. Resultados: tablas estadísticas y gráficos ................................................ 64
5. DISCUSIÓN, CONCLUSIONES Y RECOMENDACIONES........................ 79
5.1. Discusión: ................................................................................................ 79
5.2. Conclusiones:........................................................................................... 81
5.3. Recomendaciones: ................................................................................... 82
REFERENCIAS BIBLIOGRÁFICAS .................................................................... 83
ÍNDICE DE TABLAS
Tabla 1 Variable independiente...................................................................... 51
Tabla 2 Lista de cotejo..................................................................................... 52
Tabla 3 Variable dependiente .......................................................................... 53
Tabla 4 Rúbrica de evaluación ........................................................................ 54
Tabla 5 Población de estudio de la Institución educativa “TRM” .................. 57
Tabla 6 Muestra de estudio de la Institución educativa “TRM” ..................... 57
Tabla 7 Nivel de comprensión lectora pre test. ............................................... 64
Tabla 8 Cálculo de estadística descriptiva pre test. ......................................... 65
Tabla 9 Dimensión literal pre test.................................................................... 66
Tabla 10 Dimensión inferencial pre test............................................................ 67
Tabla 11 Dimensión crítica pre test................................................................... 69
Tabla 12 Nivel de comprensión lectora post test............................................... 70
Tabla 13 Cálculo de estadística descriptiva post test. ....................................... 71
Tabla 14 Dimensión literal post test.................................................................. 72
Tabla 15 Dimensión inferencial post test. ......................................................... 73
Tabla 16 Dimensión crítica: post test. ............................................................... 75
Tabla 17 Comparativo pre y post test nivel de compresión lectora................... 76
ÍNDICE DE FIGURAS
Figura 1 Nivel de comprensión lectora: pre test. .............................................. 65
Figura 2 Nivel de logro en la dimensión literal pre test.................................... 67
Figura 3 Nivel de logro en la dimensión inferencial pre test............................ 68
Figura 4 Nivel de logro en la dimensión criterial pre test................................. 69
Figura 5 Nivel de comprensión lectora post test............................................... 70
Figura 6 Nivel de logro en la dimensión literal post test. ................................. 73
Figura 7 Nivel de logro en la dimensión inferencial: post test. ........................ 74
Figura 8 Nivel de logro en la dimensión criterial post test. .............................. 76
Figura 9 Nivel de logro en la dimensión criterial post test. .............................. 77 | es_PE |
dc.format | application/pdf | es_PE |
dc.language.iso | spa | es_PE |
dc.relation | USO DEL SOFTWARE MICROSOFT WHITEBOARD PARA MEJORAR LA COMPRENSIÓN LECTORA EN LOS ESTUDIANTES DEL PRIMER GRADO DE SECUNDARIA DE LA I.E. TORIBIO RODRÍGUEZ DE MENDOZA -RODRÍGUEZ DE MENDOZA-2023. | es_PE |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | es_PE |
dc.subject | Investigación | es_PE |
dc.title | USO DEL SOFTWARE MICROSOFT WHITEBOARD PARA MEJORAR LA COMPRENSIÓN LECTORA EN LOS ESTUDIANTES DEL PRIMER GRADO DE SECUNDARIA DE LA I.E. TORIBIO RODRÍGUEZ DE MENDOZA -RODRÍGUEZ DE MENDOZA-2023. | es_PE |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis | es_PE |
dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | es_PE |
dc.publisher.country | PE | es_PE |
dc.subject.ocde | https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.03.00 | es_PE |
renati.author.dni | 72626144 | |
renati.author.dni | 73710433 | |
renati.advisor.orcid | https://orcid.org/0009-0001-8557-6329 | es_PE |
renati.advisor.dni | 42485942 | |
renati.type | https://purl.org/pe-repo/renati/type#trabajoDeInvestigacion | es_PE |
renati.level | https://purl.org/pe-repo/renati/nivel#tituloProfesional | es_PE |
renati.juror | P: Castañeda Quilique, Julio Cesar | es_PE |
renati.juror | S: Baca Cueva, Alfredo | es_PE |
renati.juror | V: Zagaceta Mori, German | es_PE |
thesis.degree.name | Profesor en Computación e Informática. | es_PE |
thesis.degree.grantor | Instituto de Educación Superior Público Pedagógico "Toribio Rodríguez de Mendoza" | es_PE |
thesis.degree.discipline | Computación e Informática. | es_PE |